TED: brand spanking new ideas for better living through science!!!

The New Inquiry has a great piece asking if TED has jumped the shark:

So many of the TED talks take on the form of those famous patent medicine tonic cure-all pitches of previous centuries, as though they must convince you not through the content of what’s being said but through the hyper-engaging style of the delivery. Each new “big idea” to “inspire the world” and “change everything” pitched from the TED stage reminds me of the swamp root and snake oil liniment being sold from a wagon a hundred years past. As Mike Bulajewski pointed out in a Tweet, “TED’s ‘revolutionary ideas’ mask capitalism as usual, giving it a narrative of progress and change.”

TED attempts to present itself as fresh, cutting edge, and outside the box but often fails to deliver. It’s become the Urban Outfitters of the ideas world, finding “cool” concepts suitable for being packaged and sold to the masses, thereby extinguishing the “cool” in the process.

At TED, “everyone is Steve Jobs” and every idea is treated like an iPad. The conferences have come to resemble religious meetings and the TED talks techno-spiritual sermons, pushing an evangelical, cultish attitude toward “the new ideas that will change the world.” Everything becomes “magical” and “inspirational.” In just the top-ten most-viewed TED talks, we get the messages of “inspiration,” “astonishment,” “insight,” “mathmagic” and the “thrilling potential of SixthSense technology”! The ideas most popular are those that pander to a metaphysical, magical portrayal of the role of technology in the world.

There are consequences to having this style of discourse dominate how technology’s role in society is understood. Where are the voices critical of corporatism? Where is there space to reach larger publics without having to take on the role of a salesperson, preacher, or self-help guru? Academics, for instance, have largely surrendered the ground of mainstream conversations about technology to business folks in the TED atmosphere.

I love TED talks, I love how they’re free, accessible, and have brought interesting ideas to millions of people. But this article makes some valid points that really needed to be made.

TED is a really interesting part of the Zeitgeist. It’s an expression of a culture which emerged in the 1990s, which has huge confidence and optimism in the power of social science and technology to improve the world instantly. It’s very much the Malcolm Gladwell view of the world, as expressed in books like The Tipping Point or Blink. It turns ideas into business pitches, and says, if you can’t express your idea in ten minutes, and make it sound shiny and new, your idea is not worth expressing.

I’m all for making ideas accessible, but what this basically means is we’re drowning in non-fiction social science books that are really ten minute TED talks pretending to be books. Careful academic work has been replaced by the over-hyped business pitch.

And TED has contributed to our culture’s chronic, deluded optimism in social science and tech. One example is Jane McGonigal’s TED talk: ‘Gaming can make a better world‘. This is a classic example of TED’s religious optimism in tech. McGonigal makes some nice points, but she seriously thinks gaming is going to solve our major global problems like climate change – and her optimism for this is based on one climate change game she devised. I’m sorry, but she’s still living in a 90s bubble of delusion. Gaming is not going to stop climate change.

TED talks often show a deep faith in measurements, data and statistics. The arch example is Hans Gosling’s talk on statistics, which is very entertaining, but for the TED audience it’s statistics-as-religious experience. It taps into their positivist faith in science: all we need to do is measure stuff, put it on a graph, observe the trends, then use this data to create a better world. We can even use such measurements to enhance global well-being (another popular TED talk is Nic Marks from the UK’s new economics foundation on well-being measurements).

Martin Seligman’s talk on Positive Psychology, again, is another example of TED’s deluded optimism in social science, and of how academic psychology has got drunk on the TED Kool-Aid (and the $$$ that roll in after a TED talk). We can make the entire world more spiritually flourishing, thanks to the magic of science! We just measure it, find the tech that improves the data, then roll it out – and guess what folks, we already got our first seed funding. Woo-hoo!

We face some really serious problems: mass unemployment, an unjust economic system, a global population heading for nine billion, and a planet struggling to support us. But if you can’t get your idea into a neat ten minute business pitch with the word ‘new’ in it, that makes the audience feel good about themselves, then sorry pal, get off the stage. I just invented a new machine that can solve depression and do your ironing! How about that folks!!!

8 thoughts on “TED: brand spanking new ideas for better living through science!!!

  1. I concur. With the respect to the quasi-religious quality of TED I’d go further still than the 90s. I find it quite straightforward to trace the appropriation of Hippie culture in tech in the bay area.

    Anthropological studies have already been written about the New Age spiritualism that permeates Silicon Valley. It fuels so much of the ideas that originate there, like the techno-rupture faith visible in the “singularity.” Slightly ironic: The positivist technovangelism that is rooted in New Age ideas purports to uphold a science-belief system while actually being quite entrenched in anti-scientific philosophy.

  2. Pingback: Can science save the world? | Revolutions

  3. Pingback: Today's Scuttlebot: Tracking Facebook Grads and Attacks on Air Force Computers - NYTimes.com

  4. Personally, I find the poetry of TED talks an entertaining and refreshing contrast to the daily prose of political ambition and international anxiety.
    Former Gov. Mario Cuomo used the poetry/prose contrast first to my ears, and I think it’s useful.
    Think auto shows: the poetry of the “concept car” and the prose of automobile manufacture and workers wages.
    Think athletics: the poetry of the beautiful dunk or the triumphant catch of the long forward pass and the prose of shut-outs and contract disputes.
    Think marriage: the poetry of romance and the prose of making it work over the long haul.
    The TED talks are poetry – why criticize them for what they are not?

  5. Another good piece on TED in the NY Mag yesterday:
    It makes a similar point about TED’s ‘techno-mysticism’:

    “The feeling that you may have just boarded a Scientology cruise ship is not accidental. It’s rooted partly in Silicon Valley’s ­techno-Rapturist soil, and partly in [Chris] Anderson’s own evangelical yearnings. Those invited to speak at TED are mailed an actual stone tablet engraved with “The TED Commandments.” (One is “Thou Shalt Not Sell From the Stage.”) June Cohen, who runs TED’s media operation, told an audience two years ago that her sister-in-law calls the TED Talk “a secular sermon.” The atheist Daniel Dennett suggested that TED could “replace” religion, observing that it “already, largely wittingly I think, adopted a lot of the key design features of good religions,” including giving away content.”

Comments are closed.